Skip to Main Content
Need Support? Let’s guide you to the right answer or agent.
ADD A NEW IDEA

STAAD.Pro

Showing 459 of 567

IMPLEMENTATION OF 4 PLATE WITH DIFFERENT THICKNESS

There is no option for 4 plates or tube beams with different thickness. Also, it could be fantastic an option with tapered tube section with different flange width or thickness
about 2 months ago in STAAD.Pro 1 Already exists

Render Profiles from Shape Editor in STAAD.Pro

If i create any member using "Shape Editor" using built up members (Stadd pro version 24.00.02.354), then during "3d rendering" it shows only line diagram. Although this problem is continuing from the earlier version also. Is ther any solutions of...
6 months ago in STAAD.Pro 1 Needs review

Separate Ice Load From Member Weight

To correctly use the ASCE 7 load combinations including atmospheric ice, the ice load (Di) needs to be separate from the member self weight. As STAAD does not include an ice load generation tool, fireproofing can be used to apply ice loads to memb...
26 days ago in STAAD.Pro 0 Needs review

Beam local axis symbol, scaling

After being introduced to StaadPRO, the one fundamental thing that I can't believe is not implemented is scaling of local beam axis symbols. It's at times almost impossible to find out the local axis of the beams in the graphic area, and this is v...
27 days ago in STAAD.Pro 0 Needs review

Accidental Torsion under Seismic Loads:

Currently, accidental torsion analysis is only supported when using the Standard response spectrum excluding Eurocode, which needs to be specified. The functionality is not available for Custom spectra, which is a critical limitation that needs to...
4 months ago in STAAD.Pro 1 Future consideration

STAAD.Pro AISC/CSA Code Checks - Eccentric Axial Specification

There is currently no way, other than directly adding rigid body members with the necessary releases, to simulate an an axial angle or tee member (brace) under eccentric axial load. This causes a high amount of manual calculations to determine the...
7 months ago in STAAD.Pro 4 Needs review

SJI JOIST MEMBER DESIGN

We propose the Joist Design member, because there is a way to use a joist Sji member but it doesnt desgin it, also considring bridging
about 2 months ago in STAAD.Pro 0 Needs review

Request to Correct Default Seismic Zone Factor for Cuddalore, Tamilnadu, India in STAAD.Pro as per IS 1893 - Part 1 - 2016

Hello STAAD.Pro Team, While generating Seismic Definitions, the software automatically assigns the Zone Factor for Cuddalore, Tamilnadu, India as 0.16. This value is not aligned with local seismic requirements and also with IS 1893 - Part 1 - 2016...
about 1 month ago in STAAD.Pro 0 Needs review

Implementation of IS18168 for steel design in STAAD Pro

No description provided
4 months ago in STAAD.Pro 1 Planned

AutoDrafter - Show Tee Sections (From Halved Wide Flanges) as the WT callout

Sometimes these drawings are sent to other colleagues that do 3D modeling, and sometimes do not know that W200x27 TEE === WT100x13. It would be an improvement for the Schedule of Sections and MTOs show the correct WT callout, when a STAAD users sp...
7 months ago in STAAD.Pro 1 Future consideration