At present in RCDC if we want to check the forces for which beam has designed then we need to go to each and every beam design forces and then we can check. Please provide a option to get a complete summary of forces at various location (Left, Mid...

Hi The current methodology for Shear Walls, involves modelling the walls in Staad.Pro and then importing them into RCDC. When a user does this, he will identify the number of bugs that are there and that Staad. Pro and RCDC dont talk to each other...

As Legacy versions, it would be useful to have options to design Plant equipment foundation (vertical vessels, exchangers, tank ring wall foundations, etc.) to STAAD Foundation Advanced 2023. Please add this feature at the earliest.

This check should be implemented in RCDC as we know during design the reinforcement area maybe needed to be increased in order to pass the beam deflection check

similar to the sliding & uplift factors, would be helpful if there's an option to enter Overturning safety factor also.

As per the New Bug Closure Template opening IDEA on User behalf {Service Case CS0486971} Frequency calculation for foundation

In foundation design, not only the footing but also the pedestal design is critical.However, STAAD Foundation currently does not support anchorage design in accordance with ACI 318 Chapter 17. As a result, the pedestal generated within the softwar...

There should be a feature in RCDC whereby you can group selected footing for combine footing design and detailing. Or, after RCDC is finish footing designs and the distance between adjacent footings are below a specified minimum, then RCDC should ...

During the design process in RCDC, I have identified the following limitations in RCC design: Pile cap design appears to be limited to a maximum of 6 piles, which restricts flexibility for larger pile groups. Concrete strength selection starts...